lexeugene

 

Contemporary Moral Problem: Nature and Value Rights

Page history last edited by Lex Eugene Peregrino 9 mos ago

Review Question:

Describe Nowheresville. How is this world different from our world?

This is a beginning of the true send of duty to be more purpose and responsible for any action that we made, this is different because duties are allowable with any action as long you have the rights.

 

Explain the doctrine of the logical correlativity of right and duties. What is Feinberg’s position on this doctrine?

This are the doctrine that all duties are involve which require other people believes and rights. Other duties intend to show that we used action when they feel to do that action; this is like an extensive but lacking in originality usage.

 

How does Feinberg explain the concept of personal desert? How would personal desert work in Nowheresville?

This will work by giving the write decision to the people by giving them an exact amount of care and providing a rights to the community when a people deserves to have right.

 

Explain the notion of a sovereign right-monopoly. How would this work in Nowheresville according to Feinberg?

This will work because this is the right to control this is like controlling the right of other people so that this is not good to implement.

 

What are claim-rights? Why does Feinberg think they are morally important?

These are the different opinion of the people which is connected to the right of a person which intend to make a connection between the rights and the people who affected it is like a petition to have a correct and equal distribution of right.

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.